高尔基说过书籍是人类进步的阶梯，就在几天前我们班举行一场大赛，这是一场觉得开卷有益和觉得开卷未必有益的辩论赛。
Gorky once said that books are the ladder of human progress. Just a few days ago, our class held a big competition, which was a debate about whether opening a book was beneficial or not.
首先正方的一辩说出了自己的观点读书可以增长知识，反方的一辩也说出了自己的观点要读好书才能长知识，正方一辩立马提出了新观点书是自己选的，你不会自己主动去选那些坏书吧？反方一辩也立马说出了新观点但是如果有一些书包装很好而内容不好了呢？正方一辩又说出了观点我看电视时有一些不适合小孩看的部分爸爸就会跳过去。
Firstly, the first argument of the affirmative side stated their viewpoint that reading can increase knowledge, while the second argument of the opposing side also stated their viewpoint that reading good books can increase knowledge. The first argument of the affirmative side immediately proposed that the new viewpoint books are self selected, and you wouldn't actively choose those bad books, would you? The opposing side immediately put forward a new viewpoint, but what if some books have good packaging but poor content? The affirmative side once again expressed their viewpoint that when I watch TV, there are some parts that are not suitable for children to watch, and my father will jump over.
就这样他俩讲的不分上下。 终于，一位同学说出了自己的观点在二战时期德国法西斯，希特勒写了一本书叫《我的奋斗》这让许多读者迷上了战争，最后让他们命送战场。就这样这位同学成功转移了话题。 于是大家开始谈一个话题不知过了多久，正方渐渐的无话可说了而反方占领了上风。
That's how they talked without distinction. Finally, a classmate expressed their views on the fascist Germany during World War II. Hitler wrote a book called 'Mein Kampf', which fascinated many readers and ultimately led them to die on the battlefield. So this student successfully changed the topic. So everyone started talking about a topic, and after a while, the affirmative side gradually had nothing to say while the negative side gained the upper hand.
就这样正方最后无话可说了而反方得到了胜利。
In the end, the affirmative side had nothing to say while the opposing side emerged victorious.